Legal Opinion

Astrom v. Hammond

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan

Decided October 15, 1842PublishedCited by 11 opinions

In equity.

1Opinion of the Court

BY THE COURT.

The complainants state in their bill that they purchased certain lands of the United States in the state of Michigan, the patent for which was issued the 1st May, 1839. That previous to the emanation of the patent, though subsequent to the entry of the land, the state of Michigan imposed a tax on the same. This tax it is alleged the state could not impose, as the land belonged to the United States, until the fee was vested in the purchaser by a patent. That the ordinance of 1787, [1 Bior. & D. 479.] and the act [Jan. 26, 1837; 5 Stat 142] which admitted Michigan into the Union,…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Omaha & Grant Smelting & Refining Co. v. TaborSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  2. Franklin v. KelleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Johnson v. BallouMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Ross v. Board of Supervisors of Outagamie Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Moyer v. McCulloughIndiana Supreme Court · 1849

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API