Legal Opinion
Allen v. Pacific Bell
District Court, C.D. California
Decided July 22, 2002No. CIV.01-04017 DTPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS PACIFIC BELL AND SBC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
TEVRIZIAN, District Judge.
I.Background
A. Factual Summary
This action was originally brought by Plaintiff Clarence Allen (“Plaintiff’) on his own behalf and as a representative of a class against Defendants Pacific Bell (“Pacific Bell”) and SBC Communications (collectively, “Defendants”). Plaintiff asserts the following claims in the Third Amended Complaint, which is the operative complaint:
1. Disability discrimination in violation of FEHA, Cal. Gov’t Code § 12940(a);
2. Disability discrimination in…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Allen v. Pacific BellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Warmsley v. New York City Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- No. 02-55721Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Tomei v. Parkwest Medical CenterDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2022