Cargill v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtBessey, J.
Guy Cargill, plaintiff in error, here referred to as the defendant, was on September 14, 1920, in the district court of Oklahoma county, convicted of rape in the first degree, and his punishment was fixed at life imprisonment in. the state penitentiary. The defendant’s cause is now here on appeal, and he seeks to have the judgment of the trial court reversed: First, on account of the reception of alleged incompetent testimony; second, because of erroneous instructions given; third, because of improper conduct of the county attorney in his argument to the jury.
The testimony on the part of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bassett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Brock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1902
- Hunter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- State v. HughesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
- Heacock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. KollenbornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- Daves v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1943
- Chamberlain v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. CrowArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Allen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.