Legal Opinion

Hill v. Hill

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 13, 1919No. 9245PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Garvin County ; F. B. Swank, Judge. Suit by James A. Hill against Ruth Hill and others. Decree for plaintiff, and defendant Ruth Hill, a minor, by Mattie Hill, her guardian, brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtTisinger, J.

This is an appeal to this court from a final judgment and decree rendered by the district court of Garvin county, in .which James A. Hill was plaintiff, and Ruth- Hill, the plaintiff in error, and John Edgar Hill, William Riley Hill, Harry Vernon Hill, Susie Peevy, nee 1-Iill, and Gde Polk, were defendants. The decree rendered by the district court was in conformity with the mandate of this court in the case of James A. Hill, plaintiff in error, against John Edgar Hill and the other parties to this cause, defendants in error, decided July 25. 1916, and Reported in 58 Okla. 707, 160 Pac. 1116.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Oklahoma City Electric, Gas & Power Co. v. BaumhoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Insurance Co. of North America v. CochranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Hill v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BroeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. State Bank of Waterloo v. City Nat. Bank of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Woodward v. PerkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Howard v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Carter Oil Co. v. EliSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Finnell v. JavineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API