Aillet v. Henry
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from the District Court of West Baton Rouge, Burle, J. contended that the service on the plaintiff should have been in french, that being his mother tongue, citing Code Pract. arts. 179, 625, 626. cited 15 La. 431.
1Opinion of the Court
The judgment of the court was pronounced by
Kins, J.
The defendant in this suit being a creditor of Aillet, the plaintiff, by a special mortgage, importing a confession of judgment, obtained an order for the seizure and sale of the hypothecated property. The plaintiff enjoined the proceeding, on the ground that his mother tongue is the french, and that the petition, notice of the order of seizure, and notice of seizure, were served on her in the english language only. Proof having been made of the facts alleged by the plaintiff, the injunction was perpetuated by the j udge below, and the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McDonough v. FostSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1842
- Nash v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1844
3Cited by4 opinions
- Consolidation Loans, Inc. v. GuercioLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Brown v. EverdingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
- Rogers v. St. MartinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
- Brantley v. PruittSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932