Legal Opinion
Roe v. Antle
District Court, D. New Mexico
Decided April 1, 1997No. CIV 96-392 BB/WWDPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BLACK, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendants’ February 19,1997 motion for summary judgment (Doc. 42). The Court has reviewed the' submissions of the parties and the relevant law, and, for the reasons set forth below, finds that Defendants’ motion should be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
I. Facts and Procedural History
Defendant Miners’ Colfax Medical Center (“Miners”), a state institution, employed Plaintiff Ronald E. Roe as manager of Miners’ Cardiopulmonary Department from 1990 to 1995. At all relevant times, Defendant David Antle was Miners’…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Singleton v. CecilCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- David C. Singleton v. Don CecilCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- David C. Singleton v. Don CecilCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999