David C. Singleton v. Don Cecil
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MAGILL, Circuit Judge.
Following the analysis of our sister circuits and Supreme Court precedent, we affirm the district court’s1 holding that, in Missouri, an at-will employment state, a discharged municipal at-will employee does not have a section 1983 substantive due process occupational liberty interest under the Fourteenth Amendment.
I
A. Facts
David Singleton worked for the City of Advance, Missouri as a police officer from 1990 until his termination in 1994. The City of Advance did not have a written employment agreement with Officer Singleton. Officer Singleton’s employment was terminable…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Singleton v. CecilCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Pamela Ann ParrisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2025