Legal Opinion

California Fruit Growers Exchange v. Sunkist Drinks, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 31, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, District Judge.

In 1907 the plaintiff, the California Fruit Growers Exchange, adopted as a trade-mark the word “Sunkist” in the marketing of fresh citrus fruits throughout the country, and established rigorous standards of quality for all sold under that brand. The word has not only been featured in advertising, but has been printed prominently on containers, on wrappers, and even on the individual pieces of fruit. About $17,000,000 has been expended in advertising the brand and the sales approximate $100,000,000 a year, aggregating about $2,250,000,000 for the entire period. The…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. California Fruit Growers Exchange v. Sunkist Drinks, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API