Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Lindsey

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 24, 1989No. 22498-1-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtForrest, J.

Patricia Lindsey appeals from the decree of dissolution which did not include a judgment for past due child support arrearages. We reverse and remand.

A temporary order was issued in the dissolution proceeding directing the husband to pay $530 per month in child support. Little was paid. At trial, the wife requested judgment for the child support arrearages. The court refused, stating "I'm not saying it's no longer owed. I'm just not going to put it in the decree." The court wanted to give the husband a "fresh start."

Temporary support installments become judgments as they fall due.1 Temporary…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of HunterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  2. In Re the Marriage of WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  3. Furgason v. FurgasonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  4. In re the Marriage of StoutCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hollingshead v. HollingsheadWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Marriage Of Heidi Kay Knowles v. Joshua Abram KnowlesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  3. Sun Life Assurance Company Of Canada, V Abriel C. Lee, Resp Heidi A. LeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API