Legal Opinion

Security Loan & Trust Co. v. Fields

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 10, 1910PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Law and Chancery Court of the city of For folk, in a proceeding by motion for a judgment under section 3211 of the Code. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtCardwell, J.

■ This is a writ of error to a judgment of the Court of Law and Chancery of the city of Norfolk in favor of the defendant in error, the holder of the negotiable note sued on, against the plaintiff in error, the Security Loan and Trust Company, an endorser of the note, the action being by motion upon notice, under section 8811'of the Code.

The notice of motion is as follows: “You are hereby notified that on the 20th day of July, in the year 1908, between the hours of ten (10) and eleven (11) A. M., I shall move the Court of Law and Chancery of the city of Norfolk, Virginia, for a judgment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Union Central Life Ins. v. PollardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  2. Morotock Insurance v. PankeySupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  3. Tardy v. Boyd's adm'orSupreme Court of Virginia · 1875

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Wheeling Savings & Loan Ass'nWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Chisholm v. GilmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Rinehart v. PirkeySupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  4. J. Maury Dove Co. v. New River Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1928
  5. Colley v. Summers Parrott Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1916

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API