Legal Opinion

Rasmussen v. Fitchburg Gas & Electric Light Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 31, 1962PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

These are actions of tort for wrongful death and conscious suffering brought against the Fitch-burg Gas and Electric Light Company (Fitchburg) and Giadone’s, Inc. (Giadone’s). The judge directed verdicts for the defendants in both cases subject to the plaintiff’s exceptions. The only exception now pressed by the plaintiff is to the direction of a verdict for Fitchburg on the death count.

We summarize the evidence as follows: Victor Rasmussen, the decedent, was employed by the Caswell-Hawthorn Company (Caswell), which was engaged in the business of awnings, floor coverings, and “odd work.” On…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Black v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  2. Braun v. . Buffalo General Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Illingsworth v. Boston Electric Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  4. Edgarton v. H. P. Welch Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  5. Griffin v. United Electric Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kent v. Gulf States Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  2. Bergendahl v. Massachusetts Electric Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  3. Gelinas v. New England Power Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  4. Burr v. Massachusetts Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
  5. Ronald A. Barrett v. Foster Grant Co., Inc., and Third-Party v. Transformer Service, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API