Legal Opinion
Lanigan v. Lasalle National Bank
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 14, 1985No. 84 C 9676PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
Plaintiff Frances Lanigan (“Lanigan”) filed this diversity action against LaSalle National Bank and eight individual defendants alleging a breach of fiduciary duty relating to a trust in which Lanigan holds a beneficial interest. Lanigan has moved for leave to amend her complaint to add a second count, an additional individual defendant and a claim for attorneys’ fees. For the following reasons, the motion is granted.
I. Factual Background
This case arose from a trust agreement executed on July 13, 1962. The agreement resulted from previous…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Sherwin S. Stern v. United States Gypsum, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Gary South v. Charles RoweCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Hess v. GrayDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
- A. Cherney Disposal Co. v. Chicago & Suburban Refuse Disposal Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc. v. Computer Systems Solutions, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
- Sheet Metal Workers Local No. 20 Welfare & Benefit Fund v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2018
- Picker International Inc. v. LeavittDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989
- Rush Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- Sable Communications of California Inc. Carlin Communications, Inc. v. Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, and Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, General Telephone Company of California, Defendant-Intervenor. Sable Communications of California Inc. Carlin Communications, Inc. v. California Public Utilities Commission, and Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, General Telephone Company of California, Defendant-Intervenor. Sable Communications of California, Inc., Plaintiff v. Pacific Telephone, Sable Communications of California Inc. Carlin Communications, Inc. Pacific Bvell, Pacific Bell v. Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, and Califonia Public Utilities Commission, Sable Communications of California Inc. Carlin Communications, Inc. v. Pacific Telephone, Now Known as Pacific Bell, Sable Communications of California, Inc. Carlin Communications, Inc. v. Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company California Public Utilities, and General Telephone Company of California, Dba Gte California, Inc., Sable Communications of California, Inc. Carlin Communications, Inc. v. Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company General Telephone Company of California, Dba Californis Inc., and California Public Utilities CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.