Legal Opinion
Sable Communications of California Inc. Carlin Communications, Inc. v. Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, and Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, General Telephone Company of California, Defendant-Intervenor. Sable Communications of California Inc. Carlin Communications, Inc. v. California Public Utilities Commission, and Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, General Telephone Company of California, Defendant-Intervenor. Sable Communications of California, Inc., Plaintiff v. Pacific Telephone, Sable Communications of California Inc. Carlin Communications, Inc. Pacific Bvell, Pacific Bell v. Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, and Califonia Public Utilities Commission, Sable Communications of California Inc. Carlin Communications, Inc. v. Pacific Telephone, Now Known as Pacific Bell, Sable Communications of California, Inc. Carlin Communications, Inc. v. Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company California Public Utilities, and General Telephone Company of California, Dba Gte California, Inc., Sable Communications of California, Inc. Carlin Communications, Inc. v. Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company General Telephone Company of California, Dba Californis Inc., and California Public Utilities Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 22, 1989No. 88-5596PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
890 F.2d 184
SABLE COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA INC.; Carlin
Communications, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant,
and
Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, Defendant,
General Telephone Company of California, Defendant-Intervenor.
SABLE COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA INC.; Carlin
Communications, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellant,
and
PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Defendant,
GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant-Intervenor.
SABLE COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA,…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hale v. ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Myron S. Gritchen v. Gordon W. CollierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Felton Hale and Richard S. Berry v. State of Arizona Arcor Enterprises, a Subdivision of the State James Ricketts, Former Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections (Doc) Samuel Lewis, Director of the Doc Marilyn Wilkens, Director of Arizona Correctional Industries Thomas Lescault, Director of Arcor Tony West, David Tierney, Earl Cobb, Thomas Donnelly, Henry Evans, Marcus Englemen, Delbert Householder, and Ray Shaffer, Members of the Board of Directors, Arcor Enterprises, John Leroy Fuller v. State of Arizona Arcor Enterprises, a Subdivision of the State James Ricketts, Former Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections (Doc) Samuel Lewis, Director of the Doc Marilyn Wilkens, Director of Arizona Correctional Industries Thomas Lescault, Director of Arcor Tony West, David Tierney, Earl Cobb, Thomas Donnelly, Henry Evans, Marcus Englemen, Delbert Householder, and Ray Shaffer, Members of the Board of Directors, Arcor Enterprises Richard Orberg, Arcor Vice President of Operations Kenneth Van De Veer, Arcor Vice President of Business and Finance John F. Wright, Former Interim Ceo, Arcor James Kinsella, Former Arcor Vice President of Business and Finance Gilbert Evans, Former Arcor Director of Operations Ralph Cluff, Arcor Operations and Control Officer Michael Ullery, Former Interim Arcor Operations and Control OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Los Angeles Alliance for Survival v. City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1997