Legal Opinion

State v. Coble

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided April 22, 2010No. 20080866-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THORNE, Judge:

¶ 1 The State brings this interlocutory appeal from the district court’s bindover order reducing the charge against defendant Frank C. Coble from distributing pornographic material, a third degree felony, see Utah Code Ann. § 76-10-1204 (Supp.2009), to lewdness, a misdemeanor, see id. § 76-9-702. The district court concluded that, under the circumstances, the felony pornography distribution charge was barred by the doctrine enunciated in State v. Shondel, 22 Utah 2d 343, 453 P.2d 146 (1969), limiting the prosecution of a defendant to the less serious of two crimes with…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Langnes v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Bailey v. BaylesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. ShondelUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. RobisonUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. FedorowiczUtah Supreme Court · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MelanconCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  2. State v. CobleCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API