State v. Robison
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NEHRING, Justice:
11 We agreed to review the court of appeals' decision to vacate James Robison's guilty plea for writing a bad check' 1 We hold that the court of appeals erred when it used an unpublished memorandum opinion to release Mr. Robison from his guilty plea for a reason never raised by the parties. The court of appeals interpreted the bad check statute to require that the check be given as part of a "substantially contemporaneous exchange." We hold that a bad check may be written where no "substantially contemporaneous exchange" occurs and that Mr. Robi-son's admitted conduct…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. HolgateUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. VerdeUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Bailey v. BaylesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Saldana v. Wirtz Cartage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. ArchambeauCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- Ockey v. LehmerUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. HummelUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. CamposCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- State v. KingUtah Supreme Court · 2008
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.