Legal Opinion

State v. Robison

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 2006No. 20050257PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEHRING, Justice:

11 We agreed to review the court of appeals' decision to vacate James Robison's guilty plea for writing a bad check' 1 We hold that the court of appeals erred when it used an unpublished memorandum opinion to release Mr. Robison from his guilty plea for a reason never raised by the parties. The court of appeals interpreted the bad check statute to require that the check be given as part of a "substantially contemporaneous exchange." We hold that a bad check may be written where no "substantially contemporaneous exchange" occurs and that Mr. Robi-son's admitted conduct…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. HolgateUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. VerdeUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Bailey v. BaylesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Saldana v. Wirtz Cartage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. ArchambeauCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Ockey v. LehmerUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. HummelUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. CamposCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  5. State v. KingUtah Supreme Court · 2008

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API