Legal Opinion

Meinhard v. Stillwell Realty Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 11, 1933No. 22587PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

As stated in the brief of counsel for the defendant in error, "Stillwell Eealty Company brought its action against Mrs. Pauline Meinhard for compensation [alleged to have been] earned by petitioner in procuring Grant & Company as tenant of retail store property of the defendant in Savannah, Georgia.” The petition as finally amended, especially when construed most strongly against the pleader, obviously fails to show that the plaintiff procured Grant & Company as the tenant for the projoerty in question, or even that it, by its efforts, contributed in any material degree to the procuring of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roman v. LobeNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Padgett v. Silver Lake Park Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  3. Luce v. CookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  4. Camp v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  5. Kirk v. Henry M. Rich & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bernstein v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  2. Mayo v. LynesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  3. Knight Drug Company v. NaismithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  4. White & Associates, Inc. v. Decker & Hallman, P.C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  5. Kingman Distributing Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API