Legal Opinion

Bonnie Co. v. Blankenship

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 29, 1919No. 6032PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Bell County Court; M. B. Blair, Judge. Action by Bonnie & Co. against J. B. Blankenship, resulting in directed verdict for defendant. Prom overruling of their motion for new trial, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, J.

We copy the following statement of this case from appellants’ brief:

“This cause was brought originally in the county court by tbe appellant against appellee to recover a debt on open account for the sum of $306, due for goods, wares, and merchandise sold by plaintiff and charged to the account of the defendant on or about August 9, 1916. The plaintiff filed its first amended original petition, setting out the facts in full and attaching a verified account, and the defendant answered by general denial and general exception, and by the denial of the verified account.
“The cause went to trial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reed v. BrewerTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. McKinney v. AndrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Mills v. JohnstonTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Bickel v. SheetsIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Bishop v. HoneyTexas Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Perkins v. NevillTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  2. Seibert v. SallyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  3. Balaguer v. MacEyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Mayfield v. SonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Krackau v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API