Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Ins. Cos. v. BARBER INSULATION

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 9, 2006No. 1050485PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cincinnati Insurance Companies ("CIC"), as subrogee of Sarah Fain and James Clyde Fain, Jr., appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendant Barber Insulation, Inc. ("Barber"); the trial court's order also enforced a settlement agreement allegedly entered into by CIC and Framco. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

I. Factual Background

This dispute arose out of a construction contract between the Fains and Dark Alexander Company, Inc. ("Dark"), dated July 26, 2001, in which Dark agreed to serve as general contractor for the construction of a "lake house" for the Fains in…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Dykes v. Lane Trucking, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  2. AR Moyer, Inc. v. GrahamSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  3. Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/GillelandArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Berkel & Co. Contractors v. Providence Hosp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  5. United Leasing Corp. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Aliant Bank v. Four Star Invs., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017
  2. Kappa Sigma Fraternity v. Price-WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  3. Qore, Inc. v. Bradford Bldg. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  4. Tull Bros. v. Peerless Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2013
  5. TD Properties, LLC v. VP Buildings, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API