Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Eisenberg
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided November 3, 1941PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Foley, S.
In this proceeding the will of Jacob M. Eisenberg, the testator, was offered for probate by two of the three persons named as executors in it. The proponents alleged that the testator was, at the time of his death, a resident of the county of New York.
The question presented for determination is the domicile of the decedent and whether it is in the county of New York or in the State of Florida. It is raised by the answer of Annie Eisenberg, the widow, who asserts in it that her husband was domiciled at his death in Dade county, Fla. She further contends in her answer that the will of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- TEXAS v. FLORIDA Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- In Re Revocation of Ancillary Letters Testamentary of the Estate of NewcombNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Dupuy v. . WurtzNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Dorrance's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- In Re the Estate of TrowbridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cocron v. CocronNew York Supreme Court · 1975
- In re the Probate of the Will of MoranNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943
- In re the Accounting of SpitzerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1953