Legal Opinion
Cocron v. Cocron
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 25, 1975PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLouis B. Heller, J.
In this action for divorce, defendant moves to quash the summons served on him and to dismiss the suit upon the grounds that:(1) the court lacks jurisdiction over the person of the defendant (CPLR 3211, subd [a], par 8) since, as a consul of Austria, he is entitled to sovereign or diplomatic immunity from all criminal and civil suits; and(2) the court does not have jurisdiction of the subject matter of this action (CPLR 3211, subd [a], par 2) because neither party fulfills the residence requirements provided for in section 230 of the Domestic Relations Law.
The parties were married in Austria…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Vanderbilt v. VanderbiltSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- In Re Revocation of Ancillary Letters Testamentary of the Estate of NewcombNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Hunt v. . HuntNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Republic of Mexico v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Rubin v. Irving Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Bustamante v. BustamanteUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Torrico v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Unanue v. UnanueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Nicolas v. NicolasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.