Legal Opinion
Edmond v. Consumer Protection Division
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided May 28, 1991No. 89-2957PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge:
The Consumer Protection Division, Office of the Attorney General for the State *1304of Maryland (“the Division”), brought an action against John Edmond in bankruptcy court to forestall discharge. The Division sought to protect the possibility of eventual recovery on an administrative judgment rendered against Edmond for violations of Maryland’s Consumer Protection Act (the “Act”), Md.Com.Law Code Ann. §§ 13-101-501. Edmond has resisted, seeking summary judgment, sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, and dismissal for failure to comply with Federal Rule…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Ross v. Communications Satellite Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. RylanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Alfred L. Snapp & Son, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Ex Rel. BarezSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Simpson v. City Of FredericksburgDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2023