Legal Opinion

United German Silver Co. v. Bronson

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 15, 1917PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Action to recover the par value of shares of the plaintiff’s capital stock issued to the defendant, brought to and tried by the Superior Court in Fairfield County, Curtis, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the defendant, and appeal by the plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

The plaintiff was incorporated October 22d, 1914, under the laws of Connecticut, and was the successor of a corporation doing a similar business and both having capital stock.

The defendant was a stockholder of the predecessor company. He devoted a great deal of time and incurred personal expenses in securing subscribers to the stock of the plaintiff and in perfecting its organization. He subscribed for fifty shares of the plaintiff of the par value of $50 each, and the certificate for the same was duly delivered to him, but, except as hereinafter stated, he never paid for his subscription.

On…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Munson v. Syracuse, Geneva & Corning R. R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Stanton v. New York & Eastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  3. Munson v. Syracuse, Geneva & Corning RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  4. Schreyer v. Turner Flouring Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1896
  5. McArthur v. Times Printing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Massoth v. Central Bus CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  2. Glass v. Newport Clothing Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  3. Mt. Pleasant Coal Co. v. WattsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Burge v. FreyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1982
  5. Shore v. Union Drug Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API