Legal Opinion

Hessey v. Heitkamp

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 4, 1880PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, Adams, J. Bast v. Ketchum, 5 Mo. App. 433; O’Fallon Building Go. v. Rodrigues, 6 Mo. App. 576 ; Moore v. Damon, 4 Mo. App. 111. Braman y. Perry, 12 Pick. 118.

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, P. J.

In December, 1872, the plaintiff sued one Allison before a justice of the peace, under the act concerning landlords and tenants, for possession and $33.35 accrued rent. Judgment was rendered for the, plaintiff according to his complaint, and the defendant took an appeal, with the present defendant as his surety in the recognizance. The Circuit Court affirmed the judgment of the justice for the same amount, adding nothing for the continued occupancy of the tenant during the pendency of the suit. Execution was issued, and the amount of this judgment was duly collected.

The appeal recognizance…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Garnet v. RodgersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  2. Adams v. WilsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1847
  3. Allen v. ScharringhausenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. Bast v. KetchumMissouri Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Moore v. DamonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1877

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hampshire Arms Hotel Co. v. St. Paul Mercury & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  2. Kincaid v. GriffithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Downing v. LashotMissouri Court of Appeals · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API