Legal Opinion
Hampshire Arms Hotel Co. v. St. Paul Mercury & Indemnity Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 16, 1943No. 33,404PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
Plaintiff, as the obligee, sues on the supersedeas bond executed by the intervener, Wells, as principal, and the defendant, as surety, in Hampshire Arms Hotel Co. v. Wells, 210 Minn. 286, 298 N. W. 152, to recover its costs on the appeal and the amount of rent accruing between the taking and the dismissal of the appeal.
On September 27, 1910, plaintiff recovered a verdict against Wells in an unlawful detainer action, entitling it to judgment for the restitution of the premises involved. Although no judgment had been entered, Wells served notice of appeal from the judgment.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. RyanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
- Post v. . DoremusNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Estate of KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- First State Bank v. C. E. Stevens Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Ham v. GreveIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Johnson v. Dave's Auto Center, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970
- National Construction Co. v. National Grange Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
- Jones v. CostaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
- Western Meat, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- National Surety Corporation v. SchwandtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.