Legal Opinion
Briscoe v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 22, 1918No. 9308PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Error from District Court, Sequoyah County; John H. Pitchford, Judge. Action by W. M. Briscoe against John E. Johnson. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
DAVIS, C.
The parties to this action appeared in the lower court as they appear here; that is, the plaintiff in error as plaintiff, and the defendant in,error as defendant.
On the 21st day of December, 1915, the plaintiff and defendant entered into a written contract for the sale of certain cattle by the defendant to the plaintiff. The contract is in words and figures as follows:
“Muldrow, Okla., Dec. 21, 1915.
“This indenture witnesseth a contract, entered into at Muldrow, Sequoyah county, Oklahoma, this 21st day of December, 1915,. by and between John E. Johnson of Mul-drow, Oklahoma,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Haier v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Southwestern Cotton Seed Oil Co. v. StriblingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fuss v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Horse Shoe Mining Co. v. Red Rose Lead & Zinc Mining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924