People v. Archie
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLeon N. Armer, J.
Defendant Archie, charged with robbery, first degree, allegedly accomplished by "display of what appeared to be a sawed-off shotgun” (Penal Law, § 160.15, subd 4) moves to dismiss the charge as contrary to the constitutional principles pronounced by the United States Supreme Court in Matter of Winship (397 US 358) and Mullaney v Wilbur (421 US 684). Winship held that the due process clause *244protected an accused against conviction except upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Mullaney struck down the burden imposed by Maine law upon a defendant charged with intentional homicide to prove…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Morrison v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- People v. BornholdtNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Bates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
- Farrell v. CzarnetskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976