Legal Opinion

People v. Archie

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1976PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeon N. Armer, J.

Defendant Archie, charged with robbery, first degree, allegedly accomplished by "display of what appeared to be a sawed-off shotgun” (Penal Law, § 160.15, subd 4) moves to dismiss the charge as contrary to the constitutional principles pronounced by the United States Supreme Court in Matter of Winship (397 US 358) and Mullaney v Wilbur (421 US 684). Winship held that the due process clause *244protected an accused against conviction except upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Mullaney struck down the burden imposed by Maine law upon a defendant charged with intentional homicide to prove…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Morrison v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. People v. BornholdtNew York Court of Appeals · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Bates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  3. Farrell v. CzarnetskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API