Legal Opinion

Pfleuger v. Hopple

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1945No. 7181PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

This is an action to quiet title to forty-shares of the capital stock of Twin Falls Canal Company. From a judgment in favor of defendants this appeal is prosecuted.

For a reversal of the judgment appellant relies upon eight assignments of error. We will consider only such assignments as are deemed material.

Substantially, the record discloses the following pertinent ■ facts:

May 26, 1919, respondent, William Hopple, entered into a contract with the State of Idaho for the purchase of the following described real estate: The Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 16, Township 10…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Glantz v. GabelMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Gardner v. WrightOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  4. McDonnell v. HuffineMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Smith v. DuffMontana Supreme Court · 1909

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hawaii Housing Authority v. MidkiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Amoco Production Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  3. Hogan v. BlakneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Franktown Creek Irrigation Co. v. Marlette Lake Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Gilbert v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API