Pfleuger v. Hopple
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.
This is an action to quiet title to forty-shares of the capital stock of Twin Falls Canal Company. From a judgment in favor of defendants this appeal is prosecuted.
For a reversal of the judgment appellant relies upon eight assignments of error. We will consider only such assignments as are deemed material.
Substantially, the record discloses the following pertinent ■ facts:
May 26, 1919, respondent, William Hopple, entered into a contract with the State of Idaho for the purchase of the following described real estate: The Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 16, Township 10…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Glantz v. GabelMontana Supreme Court · 1923
- Gardner v. WrightOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- McDonnell v. HuffineMontana Supreme Court · 1912
- Smith v. DuffMontana Supreme Court · 1909
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hawaii Housing Authority v. MidkiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Amoco Production Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Hogan v. BlakneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
- Franktown Creek Irrigation Co. v. Marlette Lake Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1961
- Gilbert v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.