Murfreesboro Medical Clinic, P.A. v. Udom
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJanice M. Holder, J.
Although I agree that the restrictive covenant in this case is unenforceable, I write separately to voice my disagreement with the majority’s holding that restrictive covenants involving physicians are unenforceable and void unless specifically permitted by Tennessee Code Annotated section 63-6-204(d) and (e) (Supp.1998). I do not believe that the legislature’s decision to validate physicians’ restrictive covenants in the two circumstances described in section 63-6-204(d) and (e) prohibits all other restrictive covenants between physicians.
In 1994, the legislature amended section 63-6-204 to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Valley Medical Specialists v. FarberArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- Lazy Seven Coal Sales, Inc. v. Stone & Hinds, P.C.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
- Spiegel v. Thomas, Mann & Smith, P.C.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
- Swafford v. HarrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
- Iredell Digestive Disease Clinic v. PetrozzaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.