Nolde & Horst Co. v. Helvering
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RUTLEDGE, Associate Justice.
The appeal is from the District Court’s dismissal of appellant’s complaint by which it sought relief in the nature of mandamus against the appellee.
The Revenue Act of 1936 (Section 602) 1 authorizes payments to be made to holders of floor stocks as of January 6, 1936, consisting of articles processed wholly or in chief value from commodities subject to processing tax under the Agricultural Adjustment Act, 7 U.S.C.A. § 601 et seq. Appellant filed its claim for payments in ac*42cordance with regulations of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue promulgated pursuant to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Work v. United States Ex Rel. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- United States Ex Rel. Louisville Cement Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. United States Ex Rel. Humboldt Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Cotonificio Bustese, S. A. v. MorgenthauCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hallmon v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Bissell v. RenoDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1999