Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Lane
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided March 3, 1978No. CIV-2-77-170PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND CERTIFICATE
NEESE, District Judge.
To dispose of the applicant’s petition to this Court for the federal writ of habeas *884corpus as law and justice require, 28 U.S.C. § 2243, the Court conducted an evidentiary hearing herein on February 16, 1978. See Rule 8,1 Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. This matter has been under advisement since.
I
(The Compulsory-Process Issue)
Mr. Taylor contended that the state of Tennessee denied him compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor in violation of the Constitution, Sixth Amendment. The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- WILWORDING Et Al. v. SWENSON, WARDENSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. AugenblickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nicky William Woodall v. James RowlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994