Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Schmidt v. La Vallee

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 1976PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. Appeal dismissed as moot, without costs.

Since relator has received a parole eligibility hearing it is now academic that he did not receive, as he should have, a prompt final parole revocation hearing (see Matter of Beattie v New York State Bd. of Parole, 39 NY2d 445). Hence, the appeal is dismissed as moot. It is not necessary to consider the appropriateness of a habeas corpus proceeding to obtain a parole revocation hearing, because, in any event, relator was lawfully detained on the subsequent criminal charge. This reasoning would result in a dismissal not only of the appeal but…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Beattie v. New York State BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lindsay v. New York State Board of ParoleNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Burke v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Gooden v. HammockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. Chadwick v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. Jackson v. New York State Board of ParoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API