Legal Opinion
Beattie v. New York State Board
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 27, 1976PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Per curiam
The issue is whether a parolee held on an unrelated criminal charge is entitled to a prompt final revocation hearing. The answer is that he is.
Preliminarily, the appeal, as has been suggested, should not bé dismissed for mootness in view of relator’s subsequent conviction of the crime for which he had been charged. Even if the issue be mooted, the appeal should not be dismissed as *447moot if a question of general interest and substantial public importance is likely to recur (People ex rel. Guggenheim v Mucci, 32 NY2d 307, 310; accord, e.g., Matter of Jones v Berman, 37 NY2d 42, 57; East Meadow…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jones v. BermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- East Meadow Community Concerts Ass'n v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 3New York Court of Appeals · 1966
- People Ex Rel. Guggenheim v. MucciNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- People Ex Rel. Donohoe v. MontanyeNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- People ex rel. Gonzales v. DalsheimNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People ex rel. Brown v. New York State Division of ParoleNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People ex rel. Walsh v. VincentNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People ex rel. Matthews v. New York State Division of ParoleNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People ex rel. Levy v. DalsheimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.