Legal Opinion

Dantzler v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 19, 1997No. 95-CF-691, 96-CO-597PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWELB, Associate Judge:

On March 28,1995, Darryl A. Dantzler was found guilty by a jury of distribution of PCP and marijuana, in violation of D.C.Code § 33 — 541(a)(1) (1993). Dantzler’s trial counsel asked the court to sentence Dantzler pursuant to the “addict exception” to the mandatory minimum sentencing statute which was then applicable to Dantzler’s PCP offense. See D.C.Code § 33 — 541(c)(2) (repealed). 1 Following an evidentiary hearing, the trial judge held that Dantzler had not established his eligibility for sentencing pursuant to the addict exception. The judge sentenced Dantzler…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Winters v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Cratty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
  4. Ready v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. MacK v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Diamen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Estate of Gaither Ex Rel. Gaither v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  3. Arrington v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Diamen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API