Legal Opinion

Holter v. Cozad

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 29, 1951No. 16747PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knauss

Plaintiff in error, a daughter and residuary legatee and devisee under the will of Fred E. Smith, deceased, prosecutes a writ of error herein to review a summary judgment and decree of the district court directing the executors of the Smith estate to convey to defendant in error the NW% of section 10; the N% of section 9 and the SWli of section 4, all in township 10 north, range 46 west, Sedgwick county, Colorado, pursuant to a contract between deceased and defendant in error.

Smith died October 4, 1948 and his will was duly admitted to probate and record in the county court of Sedgwick county…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hatfield v. BarnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
  2. Parrish v. De RemerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  3. Froyd v. SchultzIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Atwood v. Mikeska Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Pulley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Credit Investment & Loan Co. v. Guaranty Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  2. City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee Civic Developments, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Tayyara v. StetsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Ridgewood Mobile Homes Park, Inc. v. Alemeda Water & Sanitation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API