Legal Opinion
Atwood v. Mikeska Et Ux.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 9, 1911No. 832PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; J. G. Eotve, Judge. Action by George Atwood against John P.’ Mikeska 'and wife: Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
Defendants in error and plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to respectively as “first party” and “second party,” contracted in writing as follows:
“That said first party, being owners of the northeast quarter of section (15) fifteen, zownship (12) twelve north, range (4) four west of I. M., for and in consideration of the sum of ($5,000) five thousand dollars, to be paid as hereinafter stated, agrees to deliver to the said second party a good and sufficient warranty deed, with a perfect title and abstract, to the "above-described land and premises, ($250) two hundred and fifty dollars…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Glass v. HulbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Dutch v. BoydIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Morrison v. CollierIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- De Peyster v. . HasbrouckNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- Thompson v. MarshallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Farmers and Merchants Nat. Bank v. HoytSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee Civic Developments, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Holter v. CozadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951