Estep v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1ConcurrenceJustice Frankfurter
Although Congress, in 1940, and by reenactment since, provided that when a draft board determines whether a registrant is entitled to exemption or deferment the board’s decision is “final,” the Court now concludes that such a decision is not final but may be reviewed when the registrant is tried before a jury for wilful disobediénce of a board’s order. Not only is such a result opposed to the expressed will of Congress. It runs counter to the achievement of the great object avowed by Congress in enacting this legislation; it contradicts the settled practice under the Sélective Service Act…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Hirabayashi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Frank v. MangumSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Ng Fung Ho v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.