Legal Opinion

Middlebrooks v. Dunlap-Huckabee Auto Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 12, 1932No. 24589PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

Dunlap-Huckabee Auto Company filed an attachment Which was levied on an automobile as the property of the defendant, C. E. Middlebrooks. The declaration in attachment alleged, that the defendant gave the plaintiff a check for $238.30 for an amount due under and by virtue of a contract which is attached to the petition; that said check was first turned down on account of insufficient funds and payment thereon was subsequently stopped by defendant; and that the purchase-money attachment was obtained to enforce collection of the said sum.

The defendant, in the second paragraph of his answer,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Byrd & Co. v. Marietta Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Brewer v. GroganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCann v. Glynn Lumber CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  2. Horne v. Harris Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  3. Wade v. BallardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  4. Ramsey-Fender Motor Co. v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API