Legal Opinion · Dissent

Harden v. . Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 1901PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1DissentCook, J.

The plaintiff was a brakeman in the service of the Southern Railway Company (lessee of defendant), on a freight train, and was injured in making a coupling between a box-car and the shanty-car "with a link and the oldstyle draw-head." The shanty-car was not equipped with automatic couplers, nor was the train fully equipped with Janney couplers, or other modern self-coupling devices, and the Court charged the jury, citingGreenlee v. Railroad, 122 N.C. 977, 65 Am. St. Rep., 734 — since followed in Troxler v. Railroad, 124 N.C. 189, 70 Am. St. Rep., 580, and other cases — as follows: "If you…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Railroad Co. v. BarronSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Aycock v. Raleigh & Augusta Air-Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  4. Chicago & Erie Railroad v. MeechIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Railroad Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1873

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. PigottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  3. De Lashmutt v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  4. Empire Trust Co. v. Egypt Ry. Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1910
  5. Sorenson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API