Harden v. . Railroad
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1DissentCook, J.
The plaintiff was a brakeman in the service of the Southern Railway Company (lessee of defendant), on a freight train, and was injured in making a coupling between a box-car and the shanty-car "with a link and the oldstyle draw-head." The shanty-car was not equipped with automatic couplers, nor was the train fully equipped with Janney couplers, or other modern self-coupling devices, and the Court charged the jury, citingGreenlee v. Railroad, 122 N.C. 977, 65 Am. St. Rep., 734 — since followed in Troxler v. Railroad, 124 N.C. 189, 70 Am. St. Rep., 580, and other cases — as follows: "If you…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Thomas v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Railroad Co. v. BarronSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Aycock v. Raleigh & Augusta Air-Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- Chicago & Erie Railroad v. MeechIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Railroad Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. PigottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
- De Lashmutt v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Empire Trust Co. v. Egypt Ry. Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1910
- Sorenson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.