Legal Opinion

Cendant Corp. v. Forbes

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 26, 1999No. 99 Civ. 4869(JSR)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

RAKOFF, District Judge.

This Memorandum will briefly state the reasons for the Court’s Order of October 18, 1999, which stayed this action pending the Court of Appeals’ determination of respondent Forbes’ appeal from this Court’s previous orders of September 13, 1999 and October 8,1999.

Full familiarity with all prior proceedings is here presumed. Put succinctly, the Court previously denied Forbes’ motion for a stay of this action pending arbitration because the Court concluded that no aspect of the determination by petitioner Cendant Corporation’s Audit Committee that Forbes owed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  2. SATCOM International Group PLC v. ORBCOMM International Partners, L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sutherland v. Ernst & Young LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  2. Shetiwy v. Midland Credit ManagementDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  3. Cibro Petroleum Products, Inc. v. City of Albany (In Re Winimo Realty Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  4. Motorola Credit Corp. v. UzanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  5. Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. v. Startec Global Communications Corp. (In Re Startec Global Communications Corp.)District Court, D. Maryland · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API