Legal Opinion
Motorola Credit Corp. v. Uzan
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 12, 2003No. 02 Civ.666 JSRPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
RAKOFF, District Judge.
Plaintiffs seek to apply $125,000 of defendants’ money currently in plaintiffs’ possession toward partial satisfaction of an award of $177,647.59 in attorneys fees and expenses that the Hon. Frank Maas, United States Magistrate Judge, directed be paid to plaintiffs from defendants. See Judge Maas’s Memorandum Decision dated January 27, 2003 (“January 27 Decision”).
The $125,000 was originally advanced to plaintiffs in connection with defendants’ request, made first to the undersigned and then to Judge Maas (to whom supervision of much of the discovery in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. John Frank RodgersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- In Re Salomon Inc. Shareholders' Derivative LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Bradford-Scott Data Corporation, Inc. v. Physician Computer Network, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Tommie L. Toliver v. County of Sullivan Richard L. Green Lloyd T. Shimer Leon Siegal and Brian IngberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Britton v. Co-Op Banking GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Granholm v. HealdSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Motorola Credit Corp. v. UzanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. v. Startec Global Communications Corp. (In Re Startec Global Communications Corp.)District Court, D. Maryland · 2004