Legal Opinion
Kassel v. N. V. Nederlandsch Amerikaansche Stoomvaart Maatschappij
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided December 12, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam.
Judgment unanimously reversed and order unanimously modified upon the law, with ten dollars costs to the defendant. The order granting summary judgment is modified by providing therein that the motion is granted except as to the amount of the damages and by providing that an assessment to determine the amount of such damages be had before the court below, and as so modified affirmed, without costs.
Under the contract of passage the plaintiff, not having taken passage under the contract, was entitled to a refund of reichsmarks in Germany or elsewhere, depending upon where demand…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Union National Bank of Chicago v. ChapmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Hoppe v. . Russo-Asiatic BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Pan American Securities Corp. v. Fried, Krupp AktiengesellschaftAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Pan-American Securities Corp. v. Krupp AktiengesellschaftNew York Supreme Court · 1938
3Cited by5 opinions
- Baer v. United States Lines Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1942
- Eck v. N. V. Nederlandsch Amerikaansche Stoomvaart MaatschappijAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1944
- Kassel v. N. V. Nederlandsch Amerikaansche Stoomvaart MaatschappijAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Spiegel v. United States Lines Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1942
- Translateur v. United States Lines Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1942