Legal Opinion

Young's Market Co. v. Laue

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1943No. Civil No. 4566PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS J.

This action was instituted by Young’s Market Company, a California corporation, against Edith E. Laue, individually and as administratrix of the estate of her deceased husband, Fred E. Laue, to recover the reasonable value of merchandise alleged to have been sold to Fred E. and Edith E. Laue, under the name of “Desert Shores” and “Desert Shores Rendezvous,” between January 21 and March 1, 1941. Fred E. Laue died on January 24, 1941.

The defense was a denial of the allegations that the Laues were “the owners of and doing business under the name of Desert Shores or Desert Shores…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. White v. FryeArizona Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hammargren v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  2. Bennett v. Baxter Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  3. State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  4. Fowler v. Great American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  5. Schritter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API