Legal Opinion

Bissell v. . New York Central Railroad Company

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 1862PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

It is fully conceded that, in this court, there is no question that the contract for carrying the cattle at reduced rates, in consideration that the owner assume certain risks as to them, is a valid contract. And this court (Wells v. N.Y.C.R.R. Co., and Perkins v. Same), has this year decided that a contract by a passenger, to take the risk of injury to his person in consideration of riding free, is a valid contract.

In the case before us, the ticket upon which the deceased was riding is a free ticket, a pass without paying. And in consideration thereof, the passenger assumed all risks, c. The…

2Cited by48 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. VoigtSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. SelbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Squire v. New York Central RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  4. Conklin v. Canadian-Colonial Airways, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. Jacobus v. St. Paul & Chicago Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1873

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API