Dorcy v. First Trust Co. of St. Paul
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OTIS, Justice.
The relief here sought by a trust settlor and her designated beneficiaries is first, the revocation of a provision in the trust requiring successor trustees to be corporate trustees; second, the removal of the present corporate trustee; and third, the appointment of an individual successor trustee. The respondent trust company has petitioned the trial court for an order “Instructing the Petitioner as to the proposed amendment and approving or disapproving the proposed amendment and the appointment of the successor trustee.”
Pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 501.36 (1978), the court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Trust Created by WarnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Clayton v. BehleUtah Supreme Court · 1977
- In re the Amendment to a Trust Agreement between Peabody & DunningtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Thatcher v. Empire Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- The PLAINFIELD TRUST CO. v. DiemNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Smith v. State Dept. of Health & HospitalsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
- Guardianship of Garcia v. GarciaNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Adams v. John & Helen Murphey FoundationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- In Re Guardianship of LeeCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
- Matter of SchrollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.