Legal Opinion

Stanford v. Hicks

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 22, 2022No. 1:21-cv-11608Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ____________________________________ ) PAUL STANFORD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Civil Action No. 21-cv-11608-AK KATHLEEN HICKS, DAVID PEKOSKE, ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MIRO ) WEINBERGER, KATE SNYDER, ) DAN RIVERA, and MICHAEL BOTIERI, ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A. KELLEY, D.J. Plaintiff Paul Stanford brought this action in the Superior Court of Plymouth County, broadly alleging Kathleen Hicks, David Pekoske, Kristin Setera, Miro Weinberger, Kate Snyder, Dan Rivera, and Michael Botieri…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Ocasio-Hernandez v. Fortuno-BursetCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  4. Haley v. City of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  5. Alan Aulson Et Ux. Maureen Aulson v. Charles BlanchardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API