State v. Crooks
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Gorman, Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Rodney Crooks appeals from his convictions following a jury trial for aggravated robbery in violation of R.C. 2911.01(A)(1), aggravated burglary in violation of R.C. 2911.11(A)(3), and rape in violation R.C. 2907.02(A)(2). In his seven assignments of error, he contends as follows: (1) that his prosecution for the offenses was barred by the statute of limitations; (2) that retroactive application of the amendment to R.C. 2901.13(A)(3), effective March 9, 1999, enlarging the statute of limitations from six to twenty-two years for the indicted offenses,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. MoralesOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. RussellOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. Haddox, Unpublished Decision (11-20-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. Mustafa, Unpublished Decision (9-10-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. Simms, Unpublished Decision (12-23-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.