Legal Opinion

Supremacy Capital Co. v. Tri-Med Finance Co.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 30, 2001No. C-2-95-038Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

GEORGE C. SMITH, District Judge.

This action involves a failed business deal arising from a Partnership Agreement to purchase accounts receivable of health care providers. Plaintiff Supremacy Capital Company (“Supremacy”) moves for summary judgment on defendant TriMed Financing Company’s (“Tri-Med’s”) remaining counterclaims (Doc. 155). Supremacy also moves for a permanent injunction enjoining Tri-Med and its affiliates from prosecuting any action that in any way relates to the facts that gave rise to this and certain related lawsuits (Doc. 148).

For…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API