Legal Opinion

Amini Innovation Corp. v. KTY International Marketing

District Court, C.D. California

Decided March 1, 2011No. CV 07-4823 SVW (MANx)PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT; JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT KTY INTERNATIONAL MARKETING dba M PACIFIC FURNITURE [50]

STEPHEN V. WILSON, District Judge.

I. Introduction

On September 4, 2010, Plaintiff Amini Innovation Corporation (“Plaintiff’ or “AICO”) filed a motion for default judgment against Defendant KTY International Marketing dba M Pacific Furniture. The motion was originally set for a hearing on February 7, 2011. The Court found the matter suitable for resolution without oral argument. Local Rule 7-15.

For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs Motion for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Televideo Systems, Inc. K. Philip Hwang C. Gemma Hwang v. Fred P. Heidenthal, Individually and Dba South Harbor Investors and West Cliff SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Pepsico, Inc. v. California Security CansDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Indiana ex rel. Indiana Department of Workforce Development v. Jewell (In re Jewell)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2016
  2. American Welding & Gas, Inc. v. Weldworld CorporationDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2021
  3. Atlatl Group LLC v. JarvisDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023
  4. Avila v. JBL Cleaning Services LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
  5. Best Western International Incorporated v. Mayfield Investments LimitedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API