Amini Innovation Corp. v. KTY International Marketing
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT; JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT KTY INTERNATIONAL MARKETING dba M PACIFIC FURNITURE [50]
STEPHEN V. WILSON, District Judge.
I. Introduction
On September 4, 2010, Plaintiff Amini Innovation Corporation (“Plaintiff’ or “AICO”) filed a motion for default judgment against Defendant KTY International Marketing dba M Pacific Furniture. The motion was originally set for a hearing on February 7, 2011. The Court found the matter suitable for resolution without oral argument. Local Rule 7-15.
For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs Motion for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Televideo Systems, Inc. K. Philip Hwang C. Gemma Hwang v. Fred P. Heidenthal, Individually and Dba South Harbor Investors and West Cliff SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Pepsico, Inc. v. California Security CansDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Indiana ex rel. Indiana Department of Workforce Development v. Jewell (In re Jewell)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2016
- American Welding & Gas, Inc. v. Weldworld CorporationDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2021
- Atlatl Group LLC v. JarvisDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023
- Avila v. JBL Cleaning Services LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
- Best Western International Incorporated v. Mayfield Investments LimitedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.