Legal Opinion

Rost v. Board of Education

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 13, 1975PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

In this action against the board of education under the Tort Claims Act, N. J. S. A. 59:1-1 et seq., for injuries to the infant plaintiff and for consequential damages to his father, the trial judge dismissed the parent’s claim for damages by reason of his failure to give notice thereof *78to the hoard within the period of 90 days required by N. J. S. A. 59:8-8 .and the one-year time limit for judicial approval of the late filing of a claim provided by N. J. S. A. 59:8-9‘. It so held even though the infant’s claim for relief, under N. J. 8. A. 59' :8-8, would not be barred for such reasons,…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hill v. Middletown Bd. of Ed.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  2. State v. FryIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. State v. MercadoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  4. Davis v. Township of PaulsboroDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
  5. State v. ClaytonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API