Legal Opinion
State v. Fry
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided September 8, 1994No. 20935PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPerry, Judge
In this case, we are asked to decide whether incarceration in another jurisdiction is a “sufficient excuse” to avoid bond forfeiture under I.C. § 19-2927 and I.C.R. 46(e). We hold that such incarceration is not, per se, sufficient excuse to prevent forfeiture, but is merely one factor, among many, that a court may consider in making its discretionary decision whether to forfeit bail.
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The underlying facts of this ease are not in dispute. A criminal complaint was filed in Kootenai County against Steven Fry on February 16, 1993, charging him with burglary. Following his arrest,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
- Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Taylor v. TaintorSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- State v. FodgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
- Sanchez v. AraveIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. Old West Bonding Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- State v. BeckIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. SheriffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- State v. MottoleseSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- State v. PlantIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.